THE INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) suspended
support from Kenya in 1997 and 2001.This was due to poor governance policies
according to research by Global EDGE, Michigan University, US.
Recently, they threatened to stop the funding again. Is Africa ready for this?
We run the risk of losing a lot but I am chiefly worried about scientific projects. This means that research on medicine, science and technology are at stake.
We run the risk of losing a lot but I am chiefly worried about scientific projects. This means that research on medicine, science and technology are at stake.
Shortly into the month of June, various organizations
responsible for health-oriented innovations met to table their achievements over
the years of partnership. It was interesting to find out how funds are being
availed in plenty to these organizations. The Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, for example, funded 70 000 US Dollars for the development of the
Meningitis vaccine in June 2001. The disbursement of approximately $200 million
under the Exogenous Shock Facility (ESF) of IMF can be another example. This
was released to Africa in May 2009 to ‘provide policy support and financial
assistance to low-income countries facing exogenous but temporary shocks’.
Well, are these innovation partnerships for the good
of Africa or a banquet for the organizations to enjoy donor money?
THE
HAT PLATFORM
This began in 2005 and now reigns in eight
countries.
“The initial beginners were Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan and Angola which are the most affected by Human African Trypanosomiasis,” reported Dr. Augustin Kadima, the coordinator of the HAT platform in Democratic Republic of Congo.
“The initial beginners were Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan and Angola which are the most affected by Human African Trypanosomiasis,” reported Dr. Augustin Kadima, the coordinator of the HAT platform in Democratic Republic of Congo.
The platform had to exist because “HAT is so
neglected with little research, little treatment and diagnostic tools
available,” Dr. Kadima added.
The seven years of work have allowed them to develop
and implement the NECT Treatment.In 2000, over
25,000 cases of HAT were reported in Africa. By the end of 2012, WHO reported a
72.6% decrease in the cases. They have also provided fertile ground for anyone
in need of research.
They established the shortcomings in the area being
non-existent regulations, poor roads and lack of human resource, electricity and
water.
THE
LEAP PLATFORM
“LEAP was formed in a meeting in Khartoum in 2003 by
Sudan, Ethiopia, Makerere University (Uganda) and Kenya (KEMRI plus Ministry of
Health). Somalia has recently expressed interest,” said Dr. Ahmed Musa, the
current chair of Leishmaniasis East Africa Platform (LEAP)
Their objective is to develop a strong clinical
trial network. It is vital since Kala azar, in Horn of Africa alone, affects
30-40 thousand people annually.
They have managed to conduct consensus so as to
prioritize needs of the affected people. This is made easier through use of
clinical officers. These officers are trained at village level to enhance their
efficacy.
“Some workers are sponsored to travel abroad for
further studies and training,” he mentioned, as a form of capacity building.
They get international recognition through
publications and conferences. This allows them to share experiences within the
region.
The Gondar Ward in Ethiopia was renovated to a more
spacious and modern facility. The previous one of tents was inefficient since
the region experiences six months of rain.
A research and Treatment center in Arba Minah, Ethiopia.
They offer community service so as to gain
popularity and trust from the people. This, if you asked the deputy director of
Research of Kenya Trypanosomiasis Research Institute, Dr. Grace Murilla, is a
good idea since “No one supports ideas unless they understand your agenda,”
WHO accepted
LEAP which helped to reduce the duration of availing SSG’s from 70 to 17 days.
This has reduced the cost of the medicine.
“However maintenance of infrastructure and
motivating workers to stay in endemic areas is still a problem,” Dr. Musa said
in conclusion.
THE
MVP PLATFORM
Meningitis has been a problem since 1948 but it was
not until there was an epidemic in 1987 that Angola Chad and Ouagadougou met to
discuss a MVP vaccine.
The Meningitis Vaccine Project availed the medicine at
fixed price of 0.50$ per dose. Thanks to collaboration between MenAfriVac, PATH
and WHO .This cost is affordable even to those who live under a dollar per day.
The cases of Meningitis have since decreased from 188,345 to 28 805.The next
big thing for this project was its acceptance by the president of Burkina Faso
in June 2010 as the Godfather of the project. It is now implemented in 10
African countries. All these helped bring the new vaccine to the patients as
presented by Dr. Mamoudou Djingarey as the coordinator of the vaccine
introduction.
Countries like Uganda Kenya and Burundi are not
within the MVP belt but they will be vaccinated by 2014.This assurance was
voiced by Dr. Kadima. Dr. Charles Mgone, the executive Director of EDTCP added,
“Northern Uganda, North eastern border of Sudan and Chad will be implemented as
part of routine for 2016.”
They work with an accredited well known institution
in India to develop these vaccines. . It takes 8-10 years to develop a new
vaccine so they use polysaccharides non-vaccine serotype strategies are used to
while awaiting a new vaccine, added Dr. Kadima.
ANDI
(African network for Drugs and Diagnostics Innovation)
The acting director, Dr. Solomon Nwaka, mentioned
that NIPRISAN (NIX-O699) has been developed for sickle cell anaemia in Nigeria.
Their centers of excellence (COEs) are pampered with
fellowships, training and technical publication. They however have
administrative, human resource and funding issues. They sought to have a
business plan with European Union (EU) which will alleviate their standards. This
will be discussed in the 5th ANDI meeting from 1st to 3rd
October 2013.There is hope.
On the whole, their presentations may have been a
small scale representation of their achievements. I would rather settle on that
idea because a platform like HAT that receives funding from close to 15
international companies can do much more. When the effort of every innovator is
slight the general development of Africa will be slight as well. The funding
will still flow in though but is the amount equitable to the rate of innovation
in Africa?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home